Comments on: Online webtool for flash lite packaging while holding an NDA? http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/ (re)create your thoughts and expand your limits. Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:45:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Samir http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-525 Samir Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:23:48 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-525 Hi ugur, That is the question. Is it not something worth to give a rethink? Moreover getting a verisign is different case from getting a private policy statement from a site. :) Hi ugur,
That is the question. Is it not something worth to give a rethink?

Moreover getting a verisign is different case from getting a private policy statement from a site.
:)

]]> By: Ugur.- http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-524 Ugur.- Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:13:14 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-524 Will check that out. Just a question in mind; does SymbianSigned sign an NDA with developers? Will check that out. Just a question in mind; does SymbianSigned sign an NDA with developers?

]]> By: vilebody http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-523 vilebody Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:53:34 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-523 Is there a specific topic implemented in privacy policies that legally offers online services to be able to garantee protection? I'm not an expert but I can imagine clients would like to know/see the online services used to create their (mobile) content have a certificate or something that proves they are safe. Just thinking out loud.. Is there a specific topic implemented in privacy policies that legally offers online services to be able to garantee protection? I’m not an expert but I can imagine clients would like to know/see the online services used to create their (mobile) content have a certificate or something that proves they are safe. Just thinking out loud..

]]> By: Ugur.- http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-521 Ugur.- Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:10:36 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-521 ToS and Privacy Policies are legally binding documents for any online service, as well as SWFPack. ToS and Privacy Policies are legally binding documents for any online service, as well as SWFPack.

]]> By: Samir http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-520 Samir Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:14:56 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-520 I strongly agree to your point Thomas. A kind of legal documentation is good enough. Samir I strongly agree to your point Thomas. A kind of legal documentation is good enough.
Samir

]]> By: vilebody http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-519 vilebody Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:18:44 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-519 I think you have an excellent point there Samir. I was referring to swfpack because you also mentioned it and because is is a perfect example of how the legal part can stop you from using the great service some web 2.O online tools have to offer. In case of swfpack, is there anything you would or could suggest so they can assure you it's safe to use their service, even if you are holding an NDA for the project. I'm thinking of a sort of agreement or certificate to ensure people the service is safe and protects content? I think you have an excellent point there Samir. I was referring to swfpack because you also mentioned it and because is is a perfect example of how the legal part can stop you from using the great service some web 2.O online tools have to offer. In case of swfpack, is there anything you would or could suggest so they can assure you it’s safe to use their service, even if you are holding an NDA for the project. I’m thinking of a sort of agreement or certificate to ensure people the service is safe and protects content?

]]> By: Samir http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-518 Samir Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:44:54 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-518 Hi Thomas, it is not a question about only swfpack.com, rather this is complex associations with all those web tools which offers developer's aid in someway or other. with increasing compitative market in web 2.0, may be its high time we all need to rethink on the fundamental aspects of IPR and business in terms of different business models and/or contracts. But of course even as one developer may not cast doubt on any specific web tool's securities, but that does not gurantee the contract terms he may have with the clients and their matter's sensativeness. Flash Lite's case is very critical, even if you upload binary, there is no way you can encrypt it for uploading (Note your encrypt tools may save you for desktops and not handsets). So just being binary, they offer no security to your project's interests. Moreover it is not about the technicalities of the tools, rather the legal aspect, we may need to explore , so as to make next genaration web tools more effective in terms of business. regards Samir Hi Thomas,
it is not a question about only swfpack.com, rather this is complex associations with all those web tools which offers developer’s aid in someway or other. with increasing compitative market in web 2.0, may be its high time we all need to rethink on the fundamental aspects of IPR and business in terms of different business models and/or contracts.

But of course even as one developer may not cast doubt on any specific web tool’s securities, but that does not gurantee the contract terms he may have with the clients and their matter’s sensativeness. Flash Lite’s case is very critical, even if you upload binary, there is no way you can encrypt it for uploading (Note your encrypt tools may save you for desktops and not handsets). So just being binary, they offer no security to your project’s interests.

Moreover it is not about the technicalities of the tools, rather the legal aspect, we may need to explore , so as to make next genaration web tools more effective in terms of business.

regards
Samir

]]> By: Ugur.- http://vilebody.wordpress.com/2008/10/14/online-webtool-for-flash-lite-packaging-while-holding-an-nda/#comment-517 Ugur.- Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:01:17 +0000 http://vilebody.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-517 Hi Thomas, Thanks for the post. Actually it's not only a policy (textual statement), it's how the system works. Practically, there is almost no way to recover a file from 'rm' command on unix (which we use), so no one can even see the file after the SIS file is generated (or deleted by you). Only risk could be that; if you network is hacked, someone could pull the file while you upload, but if that's the case, you have much bigger concerns than SWFPack :) Ugur.- Hi Thomas,

Thanks for the post. Actually it’s not only a policy (textual statement), it’s how the system works. Practically, there is almost no way to recover a file from ‘rm’ command on unix (which we use), so no one can even see the file after the SIS file is generated (or deleted by you). Only risk could be that; if you network is hacked, someone could pull the file while you upload, but if that’s the case, you have much bigger concerns than SWFPack :)

Ugur.-

]]>